Okay, since I owned a 1984 honda Interceptor 500, these are my thoughts:
Weight, it is heavy, but not too heavy. Moving it around in a parking lot i not hard, however, more than once I almost dropped it on its right side because I let it lean a bit too far right while standing on its left, and once it starts to go, it is heavy enough you’ve to work to bring it back.
Power, the power feels manageable to me. I kept the revs below 8 grand for the most part and never had any issues. But a review I read summed it up perfectly:
Below 4000 rpm, the engine isn’t happy. Between 4 and 7 rpm it starts to haul ass. At 7000 stop looking at the tach, in a blink of an eye you’ll be a bat out of hell with more important things to look at – like the tree you’re about to hit.
There is simply no comparision powerwise between this and a Ninja 250. On the twistys or on a track, in the hands of capable riders, I’m fairly condifent the Interceptor will leave Ninja 500 in the dust. On the race track it left more than a few 600cc bikes in the dust in the 80s.
The bike has two VERY big downsides:
1- Mechanical complexity. This is the big one. Few technitions actually know how to work on this bike. It has many technical standards that simply don’t apply anymore. For one, the sprocket seal is NOT removable without spliting the engine block. On most bikes today they are. The idiot mechanic at my dealership (HONDA dealership) ended up cutting off part of the engineblock to get at it, because he simply did not know what he was doing. My bike became a paperweight due to incompotent mechanics.
1.5 – parts. Getting parts is very very hard. Nothing on that bike is still made by honda. There used to be a replaceable cam chain (a part that wears out in 50 000 km, or 30 000 miles), but it is no longer made, so replacing that part requires dissassembling the engine. Frankly, it seemed like every issue I had with my bike was going to involve pulling apart the engine.
2- The bike was the first of the modern crotch rockets. By today’s standards it is tame compared to a 600cc race replica. But it was the first “racing bike with mirrors slapped on”. This is not a bike to be treated lightly or to be coddled. It wants to be ridden hard. And it will push you to ride it hard. I took mine for a trip through the local provincial park (awesome parkway roads!). The speed limit is 60kph, and after 3 minutes I knew right away that the bike was capable of doing 120 along the whole route. And it wanted it. I had a very hard time keeping my speed DOWN to 70kph (The parkway is patrolled vigoriously and speeders are never given a break – that and all the blind corners meant I could easily become part of the scenery at those speeds). I recently took the exact same trip on my 250. On the 250 there was no sense of urgency, no need to go faster. I’m pretty confident saying that the ninja 250 is doing a much better job of keeping my ego in check and keeping me riding within my boundaries. I’ve still overstepped my skill level a couple of times, and the ninja has saved my bacon… I am not so sure the interceptor would have been so forgiving.
I absolutely love the intercetor 500. It may be my perfect bike. The size fit me perfectly, I loved the way it drove, and the SOUND from that engine was completely unlike anything else under 700cc. But it was never meant to be a learners bike. Yes, it was only 500ccs, but it was the smallest of honda’s top of the line race replicas. It was Honda’s technical masterpiece. And it is now more than 20 years old. It is a hugely complex machine, with a dwindling supply of spare parts, and an even smaller supply of trained technitions.
I love the bike, but save yourself the headache (and heart ache) and make your first bike something more current.