I’m all for more training and I support it being a legal requirement. Yes, it means forcing some people to take a class they do not need but if it raises the basic standard then I’m all for it.
I find the age bracket thing confusing though I can understand the age 21 part. Everyone knows folks (at least males) below that age have little understanding of risk. Even been proved scientifically its biological, fleeing the nest, taking on the pack leader type of thing. But differentiating between 30, 40 and 50 year old’s? Seems a bit odd.